Talk:I'm Han Solo - Star Wars Kinect/@comment-28809980-20170117093738/@comment-28809980-20170118220821

>Triple Q

I get what you mean. When there is "Rips by Album" and "Albums", the categories in "Rips by Album" have the same name than the albums so it feels like a duplicate. It's the same for "Rips by Author" and "Collaborators". To be honest it doesn't bother me because categories and articles are different things. There may be a confusion on whether the page is a collaborator or a category but at the same time the distinction between the two is important.

It's like when you are on Wikipedia on the page "Nintendo Entertainment System " and somewhere in the article there is a section with a link to "List of Nintendo Entertainment System games". That's what I tried to do with the Memes pages and the "See also " section, because the categories needed to be linked to the pages. The category "Rips featuring 7 GRAND DAD" could be just called "7 GRAND DAD" and it would be the same problem.

But I don't think we should be mixing categories and articles. L ike the Rips and the Memes, t he Collaborators and the Albums are an important part of the Content of the wiki so they deserve  to be articles and not categories, even if it may create confusion and that we use "See also" sections. Months however don't need articles so it's fine to give the information in the category.

GilvaSunner and SiIvaGunner not being collaborators is another debate. I don't really know where they would belong (SiIvaGunner is a character but the article also contains the history of the channel so...). If you think they fit better somewhere else, it's ok, you can remove them from the category.

>Description

For now I will stick to the Trivia when the description of the videos or the platform/composer is something unusual. If you want to use a Description section in your articles, that's okay but I won't change every article to include the description since most of the time it isn't relevant.