Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-29980193-20200202174253/@comment-71.168.104.194-20200205022046

KirbyPKMNInkling wrote: TonyExists wrote: If anyone here wants to know. The reason why i dislike inanimate object and or edgy characters is that i feel as if it goes against the spirit of KFAD understandable

but hobart is the best thing to ever happen to kfad so i don't 100% agree

but yeah there has to be a limit hobart pureed everybody's pickle ricks

And Monokuma may be too goofy be truely edgy but his "real self" as referenced between the standoff between him and K is like...... yeah,pretty fuckin edgy I'll say.

So it isn't without standing, but yeah. Same pattern I've seen with Lawl, fans tend to latch on to one basic concept and exaggerate it to death, like the idea of making purposefulyl bad movesets that started with Irate Gamer and the Best characters in the original Lawl then being exaggerated until pretty much every Lawl has a 'Best' or 'Toon' character (latter being taken from Toon Dr. Mario, from one of the first fan Lawls, the naming came from Toon link since Brawl was new at the time) and here, just because of Krabs and Ajit like most KfaD parodies here have a cartoon character, usually Nickelodeon and a dedicated 'cringe' character.

There's a term for that, Flanderization, coined by TVTropes, the value of some traits over others until a character or franchise pretty much becomes a complete parody of what it originally was.