Thread:71.255.116.68/@comment-5754239-20200228221934/@comment-71.255.116.68-20200228232246

Dude I was already calm.

Look at my posts in the Chiaki Sakura Rose Project thread and the King for a New Hope thread.

I was actively trying not to offend anyone and was squirreling around, I don't like backtalking an admin, but I really think this is unnecessary punishment if I was already trying to improve.

If you want to ban me, I suppose you are the admin, and you're not doing it without merit, but at the very least look at my comments in other threads.

I'm sane, collected and actively upset that I did what I did, why block someone to learn from their mistakes and calm down if they were already doing that.

My apologies, I just don't think this is right, 174 deserved it certainly, but not me.

"Please use this time to reflect about your anger issues (already did) and talk to someone you trust about managing your anger issues. (literally left for an hour and talked with my case worker) This is a chance for you to cool off and prove to me that you can manage your anger and stress. (That's what I've been doing)

When you come back after a week, please be respectful to everyone (that's what I was doing, look at my comments after my flipout, everyone minus 174 who isn't a problem because he's temporarily banned as well i was being cordial too and profusly apologizing and showing regret.) and please report anyone that is breaking the rules instead of yelling at them."  (Wasn't going to yell and was actively refaining and being wishy-washy on giving my opinions on things in the slightest chance I could get angry.)

I get that my crime was harsher, but why did 174 get two warnings before he was blocked, and I got blocked despite showing despair and regret immedately afterwards literally showing heavy regret over my actions and learning from the experience (which 174 clearly didn't), and literally nobody besides myself requested me to be blocked, yet I get blocked anyway.

It's after the fact, and I'm sorry.