Thread:SonicTokimekiRunners/@comment-11562685-20200222083842/@comment-45095138-20200222120023

I think there are far better ways to verify this claim instead of having to use this toxic, politically charged and somewhat dubious document as a source--or if it must be kept, then at the very least the reference should come with some kind of warning

edit: I should also add that unlike the other references used, the doc was clearly written by someone with a bias and a bone to pick and for that reason it is not as reliable as the other references, even if it happens to be "verified" by former team members.

It's basically the equivalent of hearsay and rumors, so I think it is important to distinguish the source as unreliable for this very reason, even if it is kept.