Thread:Rega3683/@comment-5754239-20190225212001/@comment-5754239-20190425155724

That honestly isn't much of an answer, but it's an answer I disagree with.

As I've said before, this wiki is a source of information, and removing potential valuable information from a page (even though that type of information is not used on most other pages) runs against that principle.

It's important to know when samples end and not just been. Granted, so far we haven't required editors to add anything but the start-timestamp, but I think keeping the end-timestamp doesn't hurt. In fact, removing the end-timestamp makes the article worse.