Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-29980193-20200215170205/@comment-71.169.141.39-20200219035003

KirbyPKMNInkling wrote: I AM AN IDIOT AND FORGOT TO INCLUDE FANDOM USER 71'S VOTES BECAUSE HE COULDN'T SUBMIT

THIS KILLS SHERLOCK AND WOODY

OOOOOOOOF

also I submitted Buster Star Wolf

And Bart submitted Woody ayyyyyyyyy i saveth the day once again

In all honesty though, my downvote on Sherlock was a spur of the moment decision. I voted no because he was an unoriginal character to me, but looking over his sauces, they're actually pretty good. I voted irresponsibly based on character and not sources. ..

thus i'd like to invert my vote. Sherlock Holmes is merely unoriginal at large because he's become a stock character in fiction, but making him based of the legit original character is actually a pretty interesting idea. Literature-based characters are DEFINITELY not something you see in parodies like these, even in something like Lawl, that's a category you never see, since they have nothing to make sprites from. In an event like this where all they need is a single piece of art, and the entire rest is text? Geniunely perfect for them.

In fact that actually even gave me an idea for a character cameo. If Jack & Elmo and Popcap Heroes ever have a mashup, I'd definitely love to see Jack & Annie appear in their interview. Just like the Popcap Heroes, they're another character closely associated with my childhood, and fit really well into both their source lists, being educational chapter books (edutainment) based around a time-travelling tree house filled with history (and occasionally environmental) books. (time travel)

Thus

I OVERULE MY OWN OBJECTION

My vote's for Sherlock Holmes as well, he's a pretty interesting character, and I've love to see how a guy from historically-accurate late-Victorian London would deal with all the modern day singers and concepts like video games, cartoons, rock music and internet. He's like the complete anti-thesis to Chip Skylark, and I now love it.